The New York Times and Washington Post are uncharacteristally at each other over whether Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin blew it when she had difficulty answering ABC anchor Charles Gibson's question about "the Bush Doctrine."
The New York Times says this shows Palin's ineptness. The Washington Post (which is hardly pro-Palin) points out that there have been as many as four different definitions of the so-called "Bush Doctrine" and that Palin was correct in asking Gibson for clarification of his question.
At least the Potomac press had a drop of journalistic integrity here.