Thursday, August 16, 2007

Who is this flaming radical?

  • The founding fathers had a reason for endorsing the principle of limited government; and this reason recommends defense of the constitutional scheme even to those who take their citizenship obligations lightly. The reason is simple, and it lies at the heart of the Conservative philosophy.
  • Throughout history, government has proved to be the chief instrument for thwarting man's liberty. Government represents power in the hands of some men to control and regulate the lives of other men. And power, as Lord Acton said, corrupts men, "Absolute power," he added, "corrupts absolutely." State power, considered in the abstract, need not restrict freedom: but absolute state power always does.
  • The legitimate functions of government are actually conducive to freedom. Maintaining internal order, keeping foreign foes at bay, administering justice, removing obstacles to the free interchange of goods--the exercise of these powers makes it possible for men to follow their chosen pursuits with maximum freedom. But note that the very instrument by which these desirable ends are achieved can be the instrument for achieving undesirable ends--that government can, instead of extending freedom, restrict freedom. And note, secondly, that the "can" quickly becomes "will" the moment the holders of government power are left to their own devices. This is because of the corrupting influence of power, the natural tendency of men who possess some power to take unto themselves more power. The tendency leads eventually to the acquisition of all power--whether in the hands of one or many makes little difference to the freedom of those left on the outside.
  • [R]elease the holders of state power from any restraints other than those they wish to impose upon themselves, and you are swinging down the well-travelled road to absolutism.
  • The framers of the Constitution had learned the lesson. They were not only students of history, but victims of it: they knew from vivid, personal experience that freedom depends on effective restraints against the accumulation of power in a single authority. And that is what the Constitution is: a system of restraints against the natural tendency of government to expand in the direction of absolutism.
Such were the words of the late Senator Barry Goldwater. Compared to the almost autocratic administration in power today, it is blasphemy for those politicians to call themselves conservatives.

We've become a nation of wimps and ninnies who put up with this wholesale erosion of our liberties. As Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy and he is us."

2 comments:

Dad29 said...

WHICH 'autocrat Administration'?

The one in DC, or the one in Madistan?

And don't forget the REAL Administration(s)--the bureaucrats who don't turn over with elections.

RAG said...

I mean the Bush administration, but if the shoe fits........